![]() | Technology Reference Guide 1. Introduction B. Connectivity Trends |
| Overview Just as soon as you thought the computing model was firmly placed on the ground beneath your feet, virtually every vendor is shaking it up again. Many of the hardware vendors are now re-developing their platforms on different processors. All of the major operating systems vendors are moving their products onto multiple processor families, and plan to run their applications in each other's environments. As this trend continues to spread, the gap between processing capabilities of the desktop, mini and host platforms will diminish. The result of these trends and the deployment of new desktop computing resources is that organizations and MIS planners can begin focusing on delivering real "client-oriented" solutions, evaluated against the "real" business benefit. Users of most desktop software, which includes productivity, customized applications and even operating systems will soon have more choices about what to run where than ever before. The days of close links between applications, operating systems and microprocessors are fading, and in its place are applications everywhere. As this new philosophy matures, the specific applications an organization utilizes will become a less important factor in choosing an operating system. In its place will be the focus on price/performance of the system hardware and the application developmental capabilities of the system software. In short, the classical distribution function of facilitating and implementing computer-related solutions will not change. However, the offered product suites, and their successful integration into existing corporate computing environments, will require an expanded engineering service organization. Computer-Related Solution Services on the Rise Rapidly Expanding Industry Open Competitive Environment Although many vendors have entered and left this market place, five of them have continued to dominate. Novell, IBM, Microsoft, DEC and Banyan continue to offer enhanced features, functionality and new products. Current Market Share Posture It was not until the development of IBMs OS/2 operating system that IBM competed with Novell. OS/2 began gaining market recognition in the late 80s and into the early 90s. IBMs LAN Server along with Microsofts LAN Manager began gaining market. This is especially true within organizations which depended upon IBMs mainframe and SNA strategies. Digital Equipment (DEC), depended upon the mutual mind share of David Colter (DECs co-developer of PathWorks and VMS) and Microsofts LAN Manager. This was specifically dedicated towards integrating personal computer workstations into DECs proprietary DecNet protocols. This connectivity, while superior for DECs operating environment, lacked the functionality and open integration required for other vendors (such as IBM hosts, existing Netware networks). This is reflected in their market share position of 5.5 percent. Microsoft began its entry into the network operating system industry by purchasing 3COMs network operating system division in the late 80s. 3COM migrated their 3+ family of networking software to Microsofts OS/2 operating system. 3+Open was not well received and 3COM was forced to again re-focus their attention to their core business (the manufacturing of network distribution equipment). The 3+Open family was short lived and was quickly replaced by Microsofts LAN Manager based products. Banyan has always focused upon the UNIX operating system environment. Although their product, VINES, provided functions which were difficult to support by any other operating system (other than UNIX and host operating systems), such as global naming and global directory services, Banyan did not have the capital or market awareness to compete against Novell, Microsoft and IBM. Banyan was readily accepted in the government market, however, this lack of marketing direction and exposure would not allow them to gain widespread recognition in the corporate computing industry. NOS Technology Trends Historically, network operating systems were required because of the lack of depth in the operating systems typically found at the desktop. DOS could not support the connectivity requirements of multi-processing, multi-tasking to service hundreds of attached devices. Netware is a great example of why a specialized operating system was developed to answer this performance issue. However, one must look at the trends associated with the operating systems now appearing at the desktop. OS/2, Windows NT, and UNIX are now appearing on the desktop. As explained above, new enabling processors such as the MIP, RISC and Intel super processors, can take advantage of new, more fully-featured operating systems. These more powerful operating systems will allow the desktop to communicate with the network more efficiently. This trend is supported by the coupling of network or connectivity-related components (i.e. network drivers, communication software) within the bundled operating system. NT as an example, contains all of the required software components to communicate to a network. During setup, NT is simply informed to attach itself to the network; unlike Novell workstations, where one must load additional software components before attaching to the network. The result of this trend is that the classical need for a separate network operating system is becoming less important. The network file server, communication server and eventually the application servers will run the same operating system which is used by the end-user. Only specific application modules will be required on those server devices. The separation between workstation operating systems and network operating systems is fading away and in its place is a cognate operating environment between all connected devices. This will allow software developers and network planners to focus upon price/performance issues rather than compatibility and portability issues. What Does This Mean ? This will have a dramatic affect on their market share posture. It is expected that part of Novells market share will give way to increases by Microsoft and IBM. This is not to say that Novell will soon be no longer, but rather positions Novell as a different type of provider. They will evolve into an environment provider, not a specific operating systems provider. This trend is supported by moves by both Novell and Banyan to provide a more portable version of their naming and directory services. The bottom line of these trends are that additional considerations must factor into choosing the networking environment. More attention needs to be applied to the strategic business posture and directions being taken in software development and deployment. Operating system selections must now include both workstations and server devices. This requirement will become more appearent as the client/server, messaging and desktop imaging markets mature. Barriers to Entry However, for the distribution/reseller segment of the industry, this has been a formidable barrier.
Historically, the distribution network has placed their primary focus upon the facilitation and
implementation of personal computing solutions; thus, limiting their exposure and knowledge of the
remaining spectrum of the corporate computing model. |